<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why do I need to go to church?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mikeoharalive.com/2009/11/14/why-do-i-need-to-go-to-church/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mikeoharalive.com/2009/11/14/why-do-i-need-to-go-to-church/</link>
	<description>the intersection of faith and life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 17:27:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Berlin Gambolputty</title>
		<link>http://mikeoharalive.com/2009/11/14/why-do-i-need-to-go-to-church/comment-page-1/#comment-144</link>
		<dc:creator>Berlin Gambolputty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 21:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeoharalive.com/?p=382#comment-144</guid>
		<description>I agree with this, however there is no reasons given for why a person should go to church except that it would be following Jesus. Why would this be? Is it because Jesus tell us to have fellowship with other believers? I can understand why we would need this fellowship, but what steered it into the direction of listening to a pastor at a pulpit? In my opinion, that form of leadership was the cause of a power hungry Catholic Church in the Middle Ages. Why can our Christian fellowship be more in the format of a discussion instead of a man at a pulpit? I suppose that maybe there should be a leader to give some sort of presentation, but with the way the Church is set up, there is no way of making sure what was said sticks. Church should be a presentation from a pastor and then a guided discussion of the material. Idk... it was just an idea that popped up in my head just now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with this, however there is no reasons given for why a person should go to church except that it would be following Jesus. Why would this be? Is it because Jesus tell us to have fellowship with other believers? I can understand why we would need this fellowship, but what steered it into the direction of listening to a pastor at a pulpit? In my opinion, that form of leadership was the cause of a power hungry Catholic Church in the Middle Ages. Why can our Christian fellowship be more in the format of a discussion instead of a man at a pulpit? I suppose that maybe there should be a leader to give some sort of presentation, but with the way the Church is set up, there is no way of making sure what was said sticks. Church should be a presentation from a pastor and then a guided discussion of the material. Idk&#8230; it was just an idea that popped up in my head just now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ferari Foucaultt</title>
		<link>http://mikeoharalive.com/2009/11/14/why-do-i-need-to-go-to-church/comment-page-1/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>Ferari Foucaultt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeoharalive.com/?p=382#comment-67</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t gone to church for 2 wkends/ listened to M.D.s webcast.  It&#039;s not that it&#039;s manditory, but necessary.  Once you&#039;ve had living water, you get thirsty.  Church is just a place where I can get a drink.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t gone to church for 2 wkends/ listened to M.D.s webcast.  It&#8217;s not that it&#8217;s manditory, but necessary.  Once you&#8217;ve had living water, you get thirsty.  Church is just a place where I can get a drink.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

